role of metropolitan corporation case laws Secrets
role of metropolitan corporation case laws Secrets
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟
limitation of liability to your extent of the cap provided with the registered mortgage deed(Banking Legislation)
The convictions and sentences Upheld, as misappropriation was committed while in the bank and since only the appellants were posted with the relevant time .(Criminal Appeal )
record in the department there is not any record out there whatsoever regarding promotion of the petitioner(Promotion)
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming on the main case, Additionally it is a very well-recognized proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, implement to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that here evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is topic towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-take pleasure in the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.
only over the ground of miscases remanded & only on the ground of misreading of evidence only within the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle set up by a court, which other courts are obligated to abide by.
The prosecution presented substantial evidence, together with eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature on the seized currency.
VI) The petitioner is powering the bars since arrest, investigation on the case is complete, he is no more necessary for that purpose of investigation and at this stage to keep him driving the bars before summary of trial will serve no beneficial purpose.
How much sway case regulation holds may vary by jurisdiction, and by the precise circumstances of your current case. To explore this concept, consider the following case regulation definition.
Whoever, with the intention of causing death OR with the intention of causing bodily injury into a person, by performing an act which during the ordinary course of nature is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that his act is so imminently perilous that it must in all chance cause death, causes the death from the these person, is said to commit qatl-i-amd/murder”
13309-B of 2010 to become weak types of evidence and also the evidentiary value whereof would be observed on the time with the trial. The investigation of this case has already been finalized and, Hence, confirmed custody with the petitioner in jail is not likely to serve any valuable purpose at this stage.”
dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded on the appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )